Order of Battle:
These were chosen to be the closest fit from the scenario in Polemos SPQR with the army lists given in A&MW. For the Caledonians, this meant using the "British Army 55BC - 70AD" list, but using javelinmen instead of slingers. The Romans used the "Imperial Roman Army 25BC - 300AD" list (without changes, although I did consider that if Auxiliary infantry can be upgraded to heavy infantry they should probably be upgraded to heavy armour as well).
Caledonians:
2 units of Nobles (Light Chariots, Javelin, Elite, Lt. Armour)
2 units of Light Cavalry (Light Cavalry, Javelin, Average, Lt. Armour)
2 units of Javelinmen (Light Infantry, Javelin, Average, Lt. Armour)
6 units of Warriors (Warband, Average, Lt. Armour)
Romans:
3 units of Auxiliary Cavalry (Heavy Cavalry, Med. Armour, Elite)
3 units of Auxiliary Infantry (Heavy Infantry, Med. Armour, Average)
3 units of Legionaries (Heavy Infantry, Hvy Armour, Elite)
1 unit of Artillery
Set-Up:
The Romans at the bottom, Caledonians defending the hill. The Romans have Left - Cavalry, Front Centre - Auxiliaries, Rear Centre - Legionaries, Right - Artillery and Cavalry |
Same position, different shot |
The two red counters indicate two lost bases for the Roman cavalry; or put another way, it is down to 50% effectiveness |
The Roman cavalry on the left hits the Caledonian warriors in their flank; the Roman cavalry on the right storms up the hill and hits the Caledonian javelinmen |
Same moment from a different angle |
Same position, but viewed from the summit of Mons Graupius to the rear of the Caledonians |
The Roman infantry continues to surge forwards and another Caledonian infantry unit is eliminated; the Caledonian chariots to the right are almost - but not quite - destroyed |
Same set-up as the previous Polemos SPQR game: a 3'x2' table with Baccus 6mm miniatures. The Caledonian light troops were very effective in this game: with smart play against an opponent with no missile troops, they can cause a lot of damage! It is extremely difficult even for Roman cavalry, never mind infantry, to bring them into combat. One gets a little understanding of how Caesar felt when harassed by all those chariots and why the Britons often relied on light harassing troops against the armoured might of Rome's legions.
I used the auxiliaries as heavy infantry in this game as permitted by one of the army-specific special rules: it seemed to suit the situation. However, this probably made the difference: heavy infantry are roughly twice as effective as warbands in these rules. Although this didn't happen by design, the Roman cavalry were effectively sacrificial pawns in this game to allow the majority of the Roman infantry to reach the Caledonian warriors at full-strength, which almost guarantees a victory...as in fact happened!
The absence of any command and control rules didn't give a vastly different "shape" to the game but did seem to allow the Caledonian light troops to become more effective in actively harrying the Roman advance. The Caledonian troops were also rated more strongly than in the SPQR game but as the Romans were too, it kept the qualitative difference roughly the same.
I will say more in the comparison, but Neil Thomas' rules really are a joy to play because they are so simple. They aren't necessarily shorter games, because there is more dice-rolling and more attritional combat, but they are easy on the brain. I think this one took about 40 minutes of playing time.
Reviews of Ancient & Medieval Wargaming:
here
and here
No comments:
Post a Comment