Heretical Gaming is my blog about my gaming life, featuring small skirmishes and big battles from many historical periods (and some in the mythic past or the far future too). The focus is on battle reports using a wide variety of rules, with the occasional rules review, book review and odd musing about the gaming and history. Most of the battles use 6mm-sized figures and vehicles, but occasionally 15mm and 28mm figures appear too.

Saturday, 10 April 2021

Hobby Update 10 Apr 21

Not much hobby activity this week - it has been too cold and too busy for gaming - but  I have started to prepare some of my older 1/300, 6mm, 1/285 stuff for some re-painting (they are rather battered) and re-basing for big battle games.  Whilst doing this I discovered that I have a very wide variety of Shermans, most of which I am not sure of the manufacturer.  Can anyone help?

GHQ on the left (a Firefly, the other Shermans are on the gaming table at the moment), then Baccus...after that, not sure at all

Apart from this, I have been painting up a few bases of the 6mm Napoleonic Prussians from a new manufacturer, Grumbler Miniatures.  I thought they were rather nice.  They were a little smaller than Baccus and Adler I reckoned, and perhaps a little taller than Heroics and Irregular.  They don't have the same level of raised/exaggerated detail as the Baccus, but they were easy enough to paint.  They are especially appealing as the Napoleonic Prussians are the one Napoleonic range that Baccus hasn't got around to re-doing yet.  As ever, my painting and basing hardly does them justice, but they will look nice enough en masse, I reckon.


Tuesday, 30 March 2021

Battle of Flodden (II) - Polemos Wars of the Counter-Reformation refight



For my second go at Flodden (the first refight is here), then I decided to give another set of rules a go: this time Polemos Wars of the Counter-Reformation, available for free on Polemos author David Heading's blog, Polemarch.  They are very much in skeleton draft format at the moment (more of which later) but most experienced gamers should be able to get them to work, more or less.

The Forces:

The WotCR set uses many of the basic assumptions of DBR and DB in terms of troop types.  For this battle, I used the following order of battle:

Scots Common Army: 12 x Pk, 1 x Bows, 1 x Art, 3 x Militia (n.b. I accidentally transmogrified this during the game into 6 x Tribal Foot, which had some 'interesting' consequences); depending upon how you feel, 3 x Tribal Foot might have been okay.

The pike were organized into 3 'battalia', as were the militia/tribal foot.

English Tudor  (Wars of the Roses) Army: 6 x Bills, 1 x Light Horse, 4 x Bows, 3 x Art
I chinned off the baggage requirement since this seems not to have been a feature of the battle, but one could/should use 4 baggage elements behind each army.

The terrain notes are as in the first battle, more or less. Troops move at half-speed through the marshy ground, and take one turn to cross the stream.

The Set-Up:
The Scots Army is on Branxton Hill to the South (top); The English Army is on Piper's Hill to the North (bottom), i.e. between the Scottish Army and home!
The Scottish Army: it has three main contingents of pikes, with some "Highland Rabble" (according to the Army List in DBA! - although in this battle I made them very numerous and ferocious by accident) in the Right-Rear (top-left).  A few Border Horse are on the Left Flank (right) and a few bowmen are on the Right (left).

The English Army's right wing

and its left.

A closer look at the Scottish pikemen


The Battle:

The Scots' Left makes more rapid initial progress than the Right, which is facing more English artillery fire

King James' command appears to be making up some ground, but really the other pike formation is just slowing to take the stream.

The Scottish Left splashes through the bog to get to grips with the English billmen and bowmen...

A closer look

The arrows begin to fly from and to the English left flank as the Scots approach...

English cannon balls slow the Scottish advance

Once again, it is the Scottish Left which comes to grips first, bending the English line.

Luckily for the English, they quickly seize the initiative and get back into the fight before the Scottish pike can exploit the situation; whilst the dismounted Men-at-Arms attack the pike block in the flank

Now it is the Scots' turn to retire

Then the combat ebbs and flows again!

However, the Scottish pikemen are becoming increasingly wearied and disordered, fighting on two sides whilst trying to slog up the hill

Bow and ball have slowed the progress of the Scottish Right Wing and Highlanders

The Scottish Left has begun to break, half its men are running away...

Skillfully handled English billmen make life very awkward, and in some cases downright impossible, for the Scottish pikemen who cannot make progress

And soon enough, they too join their fellow in rout

A wider view of the battle: the Scottish Left has been defeated, but the Scottish Centre, Right and Reserve are still undefeated

Stanley springs his surprise, arriving on the right flank of the advancing Highlanders

However, the Highlanders, upgrading themselves in an instant from pressed poor peasantry to ferocious clan warriors, turn with rapidity to face the threat

Their agility putting the main Scottish force to shame somewhat, as they splodge through the mud without making rapid progress

Surrey orders the English Right Wing to sort itself out, masking the Scots' Reserve and providing extra troops to the centre.  It is hard to sort out C16 troops though, so the move begins in desultory fashion.

A wider view

The Highlanders charge home against the English bowmen!

The bowmen are put to knife, sword and axe by the ferocious Highlanders...

And they quickly start running for their lives (right)! However, the English billmen are about to mirror this on their comrades (centre)

The Scottish main body finally starts to leave the mud behind it

Where the English set about them from two sides

The melee in the English left-centre become general and ferocious*

And although one of the English groups of billmen is pushed back with heavy losses, the Scottish left-front corner caves in, the King goes down in the melee and the Scots quickly collapse (centre-left)!

The surviving Scottish pikemen are in full rout, discouraging the rest of the Army.  The English billmen (left) of Stanley's detachment are already in an awkward position for the Scottish survivors, in a position to hack and slay at the defenceless running troops...

The Scots stream back up Flodden Hill...

The position at the end of the battle

 Game Notes: As a relatively experienced player of Polemos rules, in particular the Polemos: ECW and Polemos: SPQR sets by the same author, these rules had many familiar concepts in them so I could get a very decent game out of them.  Again, in many ways it followed the events of the historical battle, which I suppose argues that the rules (and the scenario) aren't all bad! Anway, I will divide my comments into the good, the interesting and the confusing:

The Good:

The factors generally seemed sensible and are fewer in number than in ECW and SPQR. 

The rules are streamlined, faster to play and generally easier to understand.

The rules have clarified some things about what happens to supporting units in certain circumstances.

The army morale system is the best and most intuitive of the iterations I have seen through Polemos WSS, ECW and SPQR.  The rallying system is simplified and effective too.

The tempo system is simplified but still very effective but has an interesting quirk, below), as is the command system, which deals with a lot of the criticisms players have had over the years of both the Polemos and DBx family of games.

The Interesting:

The 'tempo' is still present as it is through all the Polemos family of rules.  However, it proposes a very low tempo environment (the maximum number of points a side can have would be 5, and this would be vanishingly rare).  Basically each side gets D6 points/turn, and the bid has to come out of that, as well as any activity. So the number of tempo points you play with is low, so very little activity can be done really, and this declines as the battle goes on (you can't order whole wings, only units and individual battalia).

The combat system has become much more reminiscent of DBx, where it is rating + roll + tactical factors, and the ratio of the numbers, not the difference as in previous Polemos games, becomes important.  The calibration looked generally okay, but it makes combat a lot slower than the vicious fighting in SPQR and decisive charges in ECW: troops can pound away not achieving anything very much for a while here.  Okay, they can do it in the other rules as well, but that is an unusual result in those, but common here.  So you need to be able to multiply by 3/2 (or 2/3 to taste) in your head quickly.

The Confusing:

There is no turn sequence AFAIK apart from tempo player then non-tempo player.  This actually worked fine and was quite refreshing, but was unclear that this was what was intended.

As in all Polemos-system games, there are times when it is simply a bit unclear as to what outcome moves (recoils and so on) should happen, when many bases are fighting next to each other in different directions.  What happens when bases hit at oblique angles, contact two bases in the flank simultaneously whilst another unit is attacking the front, that kind of thing.  Even flank attacks aren't really defined.  Obviously as a solo player you can always just say "I know one when I see it" but you will inevitably hit marginal cases even playing solo quite quickly. 

(* as in this picture above)

I wasn't sure if troops should 'follow-up' recoiling enemies automatically.  The rules give a combat factor for this, but it isn't obvious to me if that factor should be applied if the winner moves forward and renews the combat in the next turn, or it happens automatically.  And in the latter case, which if any supports should go with it?  Since the rules didn't indicate anything (unless I missed them, which is very possible), I decided to not make following up automatic, so if the other side won the tempo in the next turn, it could negate that advantage if it deliberately moved back into combat.

Anyway, overall I was pretty impressed and I am looking forward to giving these another go soon.

Figures by Baccus 6mm.

Battle of Flodden (I) - The DBA Refight


Another cover with Peter Gilder's Napoleonics on them.  Never gets boring.  I wonder if he was the single biggest influence in the history of wargaming on how 'premium' games should look?  Anyway, I digress!

Miniature Wargames 41 carried a scenario written by terrain-maestro Ian Weekley about the Battle of Flodden, in which a large Scottish Army under James was defeated by an English army as it was returning North towards Scotland.  Usually Ian Weekley tied his articles in to some element of terrain making, but not this time.  He had however visit the battlefield, which inspired the article.  I too have visited it, and somewhat later, it has inspired me to give it a go too...

The Forces:

This battle marked both the end and beginning of an era: the end of an era, as Scottish pikemen with their King at their head attacked the English army made up of bill and bow, with the nobility dismounting and fighting amongst them; but also the beginning of an era, as artillery played its part on the battlefield, particularly on the English side.
For this refight, I used armies based upon the relevant DBA lists (which do extend just far enough to cover this battle):

Scots Common Army: 12 x Pk (including the general's element), 1 x 3Bw, 3 x 5Hd, 1 x LH

The army list recommends Artillery rather than Light Horse.  Artillery was definitely present on the Scots' side, but appeared to have been entirely ineffective, so I chose the non-list LH element for the Borderers, who definitely were present.  But one alternative would be to lose one of the other elements and use an artillery element instead.  If this is chosen, consider giving it a -1 modifier to reflect its inadequacy.

English Tudor  (Wars of the Roses) Army: 6 x 4Bd, 1 x LH, 4 x 4Lb, 2 x Art
One 4Bd element and one 4Lb element are off-table with Stanley; they can enter the board (paying normal points cost) on the English or either of the flanking edges on any English turn, subject to the player rolling 4-6 on a D6.  

The terrain was simple but important.  There was barely a stream between the two hills, but the ground around it was very waterlogged and boggy. This counts as 'Rough Ground' in DBA, and the stream does count as an obstacle to movement. Also the ground is considered to be sloping all the way from the stream to the hills, which have to be imagined as continuously sloping all the way up to the edge of the board - i.e. units may get the 'uphill' bonus even if they are apparently on the flat bit between the marked marshy area and the physical hill models.  Hope that makes sense!

 The Set-Up:

The armies face off against each other.  The Scots are on Branxton Hill to the South (top) whilst the English defend Piper's Hill to the North (bottom)

The Scottish pikemen in four groups, with its auxiliaries and archers to the right (left) and Borderers to the left (right)

The English in roughly two equal groups, with their artillery in the centre and their own Border Horse in the rear.  The English commander (the Earl of Surrey) is nearby, deciding where to dismount and join the fray...

The view up Branxton Stead, showing the marshy ground between the two sides.

The Battle:
English artillery fire tells early, disrupting the King's advance (top)...

The Scots struggle through the marshy ground, harassed by the English guns

Progress is painfully slow from the slowness of the ground and the effect of the fire

A wider view

With feet muddy but spirits undaunted, the leading Scottish pikemen (led by Crawford) advance up the slope towards the English billmen and bowmen; note that one of the Scottish pike blocks (centre-top) has lost heavily from the cannon fire whilst traversing the boggy ground

A wider view
And the pikemen hit home!

Half of the King's men (under Errol) get up the slope, whilst the King, whose standard has attracted far more than its share of cannonballs, is still trying to get through the bottom of the marshy ground

Taking the initiative, the English men-at-arms on the Right push back the Scottish pikemen down the slope, pursuing them

The rest of the English line follow up, to maintain its cohesion

Surrey withdraws his men-at-arms to form a reserve, whilst the militia billmen and bowmen contest the slopes with the second Scottish pike block

The English billmen try and envelop the advancing Scottish pikemen (left) whilst the fierce struggle rages...

Whilst the Scottish Right has failed to break through the English Left, and is now being swarmed around.

Scottish pikemen are going down fast now, but their supports are struggling to get to their aid fast enough, delayed by archery and mud

The Scottish archers rush forward (left) with sword and dagger to try and help their struggling comrades, but the King and his men are still just short of the combat

Both sides on the English Right are fighting hard - can the Scots second pike block (centre-right) punch through the English line?

...but their comrades are being driven remorselessly back

The Scottish Right is in all kinds of trouble, just as the King arrives!

The Scottish archers are being attacked in the flank by the English billmen (centre-left)

The struggle on the English Right continues unabated...

Until suddenly, one of the pike blocks begins to collapse!

The Scottish archers are massacred by the English

The position at the end of the battle, as the Scots became demoralized and retreated.

Game Notes: A reasonably faithful recreation of the actual battle, although Stanley stubbornly refused to arrive!  This bad luck was replicated by the Scots' pikemen, who could just never seem to win a crucial throw, or generate enough PIPs when they needed them.  The English artillery was very useful to them, destroying one Pike element but just as importantly, disrupting the Scottish advance and causing it to become prohibitively expensive in PIPs to maintain, so the Scottish attack became disjointed and was defeated in detail.  The terrain rules seemed to model the effects of the ground on the day reasonably well.

On the other hand, with good-quality close combat troops (which 'Blades' and supported 'Pike' are), I do get the feeling sometimes that I am rolling a couple of dice every turn just waiting for a result skewed enough to really make something happen.  It is quite bizarre, but there gets to be a point where there is almost a Nash equilibrium where it isn't obvious that either side can improve its position, so you just have to wait out and let the dice decide.  This is probably where DBA fails slightly against more traditional 'attritional' rules, since even if the two elements involved are in stalemate, they should become less effective relative to all the other units in the game.  On the other hand, not sure how often that would make much of a difference overall.  

Figures by Baccus 6mm.